After Le Maître est l'Enfant, Estelle and I watched another French education documentary tonight, Être plutôt qu’avoir ? - 'To Be rather than to have?' It was a look at education, especially in France, historically. I found the pictures of school before the 19th-century desks-in-rows era interesting. Like this from Pieter Bruegel The Elder.
And then a look at some of the ways that some educators have enriched education for primary-age children: through circle times, philosophy for children, forest school, Montessori classes. Lots to think about again: good to now and again, or even regularly, challenge the way we teach - how much is a product of the relatively short history of public education, and how much is a conscious approach to real education?
And then a look at some of the ways that some educators have enriched education for primary-age children: through circle times, philosophy for children, forest school, Montessori classes. Lots to think about again: good to now and again, or even regularly, challenge the way we teach - how much is a product of the relatively short history of public education, and how much is a conscious approach to real education?
- The child is of the same nature as us [adults].
- Being bigger does not necessarily mean being above others.
- A child's academic behavior is a function of his constitution, health, and physiological state.
- No one - neither the child nor the adult - likes to be commanded by authority.
- No one likes to align oneself, because to align oneself is to obey passively an external order.
- No one likes to be forced to do a certain job, even if this work does not displease him or her particularly. It is being forced that is paralyzing.
- Everyone likes to choose their job, even if this choice is not advantageous.
- No one likes to move mindlessly, to act like a robot, that is to do acts, to bend to thoughts that are prescribed in mechanisms in which he does not participate.
- We [the teachers] need to motivate the work.
- No more scholasticism.
- Everyone wants to succeed. Failure is inhibitory, destructive of progress and enthusiasm.
- It is not games that are natural to the child, but work.
- The normal path of [knowledge] acquisition is not observation, explanation and demonstration, the essential process of the School, but experimental trial and error, a natural and universal process.
- Memorization, which the School deals with in so many cases, is applicable and valuable only when it is truly in service of life.
- [Knowledge] acquisition does not take place as one sometimes believes, by the study of rules and laws, but by experience. To study these rules and laws in [language], in art, in mathematics, in science, is to place the cart before the horse.
- Intelligence is not, as scholasticism teaches, a specific faculty functioning as a closed circuit, independent of the other vital elements of the individual.
- The School only cultivates an abstract form of intelligence, which operates outside living reality, by means of words and ideas implanted by memorization.
- The child does not like to listen to an ex cathedra lesson.
- The child does not tire of doing work that is in line with his life, work which is, so to speak, functional for him.
- No one, neither child nor adult, likes control and punishment, which is always considered an attack on one's dignity, especially when exercised in public.
- Grades and rankings are always a mistake.
- Speak as little as possible.
- The child does not like the work of a herd to which the individual has to fold like a robot. He loves individual work or teamwork in a cooperative community.
- Order and discipline are needed in class.
- Punishments are always a mistake. They are humiliating for all and never achieve the desired goal. They are at best a last resort.
- The new life of the School presupposes school cooperation, that is, the management by its users, including the educator, of life and school work.
- Class overcrowding is always a pedagogical error.
- The current design of large school complexes results in the anonymity of teachers and pupils; It is, therefore, always an error and a hindrance.
- The democracy of tomorrow is being prepared by democracy at the School. An authoritarian regime at the School cannot be formative of democratic citizens.
- One can only educate in dignity. Respecting children, who must respect their masters, is one of the first conditions for the redemption of the School.
- The opposition of the pedagogical reaction, an element of the social and political reaction, is also a constant, with whom we shall have, alas! to reckon unless we are able to avoid or correct it ourselves.
- There is also a constant that justifies all our trial and error and authenticates our action: it is the optimistic hope in life.
Thanks for helping me re-discover the Freinet pedagogy, which I heard a bit about in my teacher training, but never could see in action. I would love to see how it really is in the class...
ReplyDeleteLa Prairie (primaire and collège), in Rangueil, is in the Pédagogie Nouvelle movement: it's close to Freinet. I spent a day there to see how it works: in my view it's a great school, which manages to turn a lot of the movement's beautiful principles into a functioning and well structured environment.
The main problem is, when these kids leave La Prairie and join a conventional collège or lycée, they usually have to re-take a year as it's so different from the way they are used to learning!
Would I have made that choice as a parent, had I lived close and not had the option of the International School? I think I would.
Sarah